Closing Down Gentilly reactor: Is Parti Quebecois colluding with anti-nuclear London interests?

Centrale nucléaire de Gentilly, Québec, April 2011 / Wikimedia *

Anti-nuclear psychosis.
Over 800 jobs lost.

Is this possible that the Parti Quebecois would endorse and promote
London’s Green depopulation Agenda?


  • A nuclear plant produces reliable, clean, continuous electrical power on a site 70-100 times smaller than the vast fields required for unreliable, intermittent solar or wind “farms.” (1)
  • Nuclear reactions produce the most energy-dense form of energy; thousands-fold more dense than so-called renewables. (2)
  • On a worldwide scale, the low energy-flux density of so-called renewable energies corresponds to a maximum population potential of 1 to 2 billion people. (3)
  • SAFER, CHEAPER, MORE EFFICIENT Fourth-Generation Reactors – A new, fourth generation of nuclear reactors is ready to replace the standard reactors that have been producing power for 40 years. These new high-temperature reactors are almost 50 percent more efficient than conventional nuclear reactors, and supersafe. (4)

“… civilization on this planet is now doomed to a rapidly accelerating descent of all mankind in a general dark age, a time during which the population of this planet would descend, foreseeably, from the presently estimated level of more than six-and-a-half billions persons, to the less than two billions which has been the stated goal of Britain’s Prince Philip and the Prince’s explicitly pro-genocidal World Wildlife Fund. 

(…) without the proliferation of the development of nuclear–fission as a primary source of power, the presently leading problems of nourishing the population of this planet can not be solved in a timely way.

(…) nuclear-fission technologies are not only the basis for a high-technology economic culture, but are an urgently needed demand as a unique solution for the tasks of maintaining and raising the level of employed technology and products. Without such technology, the world is already running out of the supplies of such things as the drinkable cheap water on which decent life depends. (…)

In the physical-chemist’s history of our planet, it has been the up-shift in energy-flux-density in the types of sources of applied power employed, on which the continued existence of mankind depends for maintaining the human population even at its present levels. Without the power of modes of nuclear fission associated with uranium- and thorium-based nuclear fuels, the planet is now threatened with a general catastrophe.

Prince Philip’s shamelessly stated (…) is not only to halt and reverse scientific and technological progress, but to degrade the population of the entire planet(…)” To achieve the social-political goals of the fascist recipes which the British monarchy’s present policies intend, it is considered necessary to turn back the clock of progress in all heretofore industrialized nations …”  (5) (emphasis added)

Lyndon LaRouche, Economic Science. in Short, May 29, 2009


The East Goes Nuclear While the West Heads for the Caves

by Michael Billington
January 18, 2010

In the midst of the greatest international financial crisis in modern history, all of Asia, including, emphatically, the Russian Federation, is engaged in a process of rapid expansion of nuclear power construction, a source of great pride to the nuclear producer-nations, and of great hope to their clients among the developing sector nations. These former colonies have been systematically deprived of their natural right to the use of nuclear power by the continuing legacy of British imperial power. What was promised by the Atoms for Peace process of U.S. Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy—access to the virtually unlimited power potential of nuclear energy, to escape from the colonial legacy of backwardness and poverty—was abruptly sabotaged in the 1970s. This was done under the cover of the anti-nuclear hysteria fostered by Prince Philip’s environmentalist movement, and the fraudulent argument that non-proliferation of nuclear weapons required a halt to peaceful uses of nuclear power. Now, the nations of Asia have definitively rejected British imperial dictates, asserting their long-term development to be centered, necessarily, upon expanded nuclear power capacities. (emphasis added)

Unfortunately, the West is still mired in the British Empire’s muck. While Asian nations are currently engaged in the construction of 43 nuclear plants, the entire rest of the world is constructing only 12. The United States, once the unquestioned leader in nuclear power development, is now constructing but one facility—and that is simply the completion of a mothballed TVA plant, suspended in the 1980s. All of Western Europe is constructing only two plants, while Germany and Sweden have determined to phase out all their nuclear power plants—although the global economic collapse is forcing a reconsideration of that lunacy.

In the United States, 224 nuclear scientists, engineers, and others have issued a public letter this week to President Obama’s Science Adviser John Holdren, himself an anti-nuclear, anti-science zero-growther, warning that “the world is leaving us behind.” The letter reads in part: “Our nation needs to proceed quickly—not twenty or fifty years from now—while the people who pioneered this science and engineering can still provide guidance to a new generation of scientists and engineers. There is no political, economic, or technical justification for delaying the benefits that nuclear power will bring to the United States, while the rest of the world forges ahead.”

Contrast this to South Korea, where the Ministry of Knowledge Economy announced Jan. 13 that South Korea intends to export 80 nuclear plants, with a total value of $400 billion, by 2030. South Korea recently became only the sixth nuclear exporter, by winning a contract to build four nuclear units for the UAE.

Lyndon LaRouche described this situation starkly:

What you are seeing in the trans-Atlantic region is a dying civilization, a dying, self-doomed civilization. What you are seeing in the trans-Pacific region—especially on the Asian side, and the Indian Ocean side of that—you’re seeing progress! When you look at the Pacific economy, the Pacific Ocean orientation, you find nuclear power increasing all over the place. But when you look at the trans-Atlantic area, you find nuclear power is almost banned, and backwardness goes back almost to the depths of the cavemen.

– Russia Leads the Way

The Oct. 13, 2009 agreements signed between Russia and China during Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s visit to Beijing, which centered on cooperative development of nuclear power and high-speed rail transportation systems, characterize the transformation of all of Asia taking place today. Similar agreements were signed by India, with both Russia and China. The three-way development process between Russia, China, and India, which is to be financed, in part, by China’s use of its huge dollar reserves, was described by LaRouche as an historic step towards realizing the “Four Power Alliance” among Russia, China, India, and the United States, an alliance proposed by LaRouche as the necessary bedrock for creating a new world credit system to replace the current bankrupt world monetary system.

Asia was historically divided up for looting among the European colonial powers, and, after the Second World War, divided by those same powers along “Cold War” lines. Today, for the first time in history, the Asian nations are cooperating on the idea of Great Projects, understanding that their sovereign interests lie in the mutually beneficial development of the entire region. One question is repeatedly posed by leaders of these Asian powers: Why has the West, and the U.S.A., in particular, not joined them in this physical-economic solution to the collapse of the world financial system?

Russia has pledged to China that it will both expand its aid in developing the Tiawan nuclear complex in Lianyungang, and provide China with two breeder reactors, which will breed as much or more fuel than is used up in the energy generation process. Russia is also building a uranium enrichment facility for China, and providing a supply of uranium.

India’s long-standing economic cooperation with Russia had been stalled for several years after the fall of the Soviet Union, but the relationship is now back on a fast track. Sergei Kiriyenko, the head of Russia’s state nuclear corporation Rosatom, told Prime Minister Putin in December, that Russia “will supply 12-14 units made according to Russian technology,” based not on individual units, but “series of such power units.” Kiriyenko added that Russia’s nuclear industry is “planning a signal event—the resumption of mass construction of nuclear power plants, and these are not just plans, but practice.” Russia will commission at least one new nuclear power unit per year, starting in 2010, with Unit 2 of the Rostov nuclear plant in Russia itself, and the Bushehr plant in Iran, followed by the Kudankulam plant in India, in 2011.

“I have just recently returned from India. This country really needs power,” said Academician Nikolai Ponomaryov-Stepnoy, the vice president of the Russian Nuclear Center-Kurchatov Institute, on Jan. 15, as reported by “India is thinking about the future. And we should think about the future, too. The reactors we build will need fuel for their entire service life, i.e., into the 2070s. Therefore we have to be thinking about new nuclear technologies, for which there will be a guaranteed fuel supply. I mean fast breeder reactors, with a complete fuel cycle. I think we now need to be offering India cooperation in this area. In the course of that, we shall provide our partners not only with electric power, but also fuel for hydrogen or electric cars. And so, it is necessary to develop yet another component of the nuclear power industry, and that is nuclear hydrogen power.”

In a webcast on Dec. 3, 2009, Putin answered a question from a machinist, on the future of the nuclear industry: “We have grand plans for the development of nuclear power generation. Whereas, during the Soviet years, a mere 35-38 major nuclear power generating units were built, we plan to build 30-32 over the next decade. This is a colossal project. The Rosatom state corporation has enough funds, and we have provided additional support.”

Rosatom is also ready to launch its first “floating nuclear plants,” small reactors in the 70-250 MW range, modeled on the nuclear reactors used in their submarines and ice-breakers. They are to be mass produced, placed on barges, and towed to areas for immediate use, generating electricity sufficient for a city of 200,000, or for water desalination. The first plant is due off the production line this year, with many nations lining up to take advantage of this unique capacity.

– China and India –

China, with only 11 commercial nuclear power plants (compared to 104 in the U.S.), is far in the lead in terms of units under construction, at 20. Russia follows, with 9, South Korea with 6, and India with 5. Many more are planned, with the intention of increasing China’s nuclear capacity sixfold, to 60 GW or more, by 2020, and then tripling that by 2030. Although still importing most of its nuclear plants, China plans to become self-sufficient in reactor design and construction, using the Westinghouse AP 1000 as the primary basis of technology development, according to the World Nuclear Association. China is working towards developing a complete fuel-cycle capacity, with the Russian-provided enrichment facilities and breeder reactors crucial to that effort.

India, with 18 commercial nuclear plants (of which, 16 are indigenous), and 5 under construction, has moved to develop its own nuclear technology, in large part because it does not want to be held hostage to the international nonproliferation mafia, since it has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty; India has refused to give up its right to develop nuclear weapons, unless worldwide disarmament of nuclear weapons take place. Holding one of the world’s largest reserves of thorium, India has taken the lead in the development of the thorium-cycle reactor.

India intends to have 20 GW of nuclear power capacity by 2020, and to more than triple that by 2032. By 2050, it intends to have 25% of their electricity generated by nuclear facilities.

The Bush Administration’s nuclear agreement with India, which won the approval of the IAEA in 2008, lifted most of the restraints on nuclear trade with India. Although the United States itself has been slow to set up any nuclear trade with India—and is not likely to, under the anti-nuclear Obama Administration—Russia and China have quickly moved to expand nuclear cooperation with their fellow Eurasian power.

– South Korea Steps Forward –

South Korea clinched the $40 billion agreement with the U.A.E. for four nuclear reactors on Dec. 27, beating out both a French, a joint U.S./Japan bid, and giving the people of South Korea a burst of pride that they had emerged as a fully developed nation. The subsequent announcement of plans to export 80 nuclear plants by 2030 clearly demonstrates the role of nuclear power in turning underdeveloped nations into modern industrial nations.

Dr. Chang Kun Lee, the former Commissioner of South Korea’s Atomic Energy Commission, in his article (21st Century Science and Technology, Winter 2007-08; Korea’s Nuclear Past, Present, and Future), described how South Korea, under President Syngman Rhee, agreed, in 1958, to work with the United States to rescue his country from the devastation of colonialism and war, through the development of nuclear power, both for electricity, and as a science driver for the economy and the education of the nation’s youth in the frontiers of physics. South Korea, Dr. Lee wrote, “is the only country in the world that has transformed its status from an LDC [Less Developed Country] to a nuclear-developed nation in the past 50 years.”

Korea was delighted, but not surprised, that they won the bid for the U.A.E. plants. It has 30 years of nuclear experience without mishap, enjoys a 93.3% reactor utilization rate (the highest in the world), and can build plants faster and cheaper than its competitors.

While Korea has geared up its nuclear plant production capability, its fusion program is providing worldwide leadership. Korea’s KSTAR superconducting tokamak is carrying out research, and training scientists and engineers, in preparation for Korean participation in the international ITER fusion program, and Korea will start design work on a commercial demonstration fusion power plant over the next two decades.

President Lee Myung-bak, upon his return from the Copenhagen Climate Conference in December, announced that his nation was intent on achieving “technology independence” in the next few years. This referred to the standing nuclear trade agreement with the United States, which is due to be renewed in 2014. As it stands, South Korea may not develop a “full cycle” for its nuclear industry, but must depend on foreign suppliers for enriched uranium, and must store its spent fuel, rather than reprocessing it to be used again. This is unacceptable for a modern nation, which must be able to assure those countries who are purchasing Korea’s nuclear facilities that they can supply full material support. Under the NPT, of which South Korea is a signator, they have the absolute right to the complete cycle.

While the “non-proliferation” gang in the United States has enormous power over the negotiations, and will use that power to try to block South Korea’s sovereign rights, South Korea has the weight of the emerging Asian renaissance in nuclear power on its side, and it may be near impossible for the anti-nuclear mob to stand in the way. President Lee, in fact, said that his government “plans to advance the target year of technology independence, which was originally set for 2015, by a few years.”

– Southeast and Southwest Asia –

South Korea’s breakout as a nuclear exporter is especially important for the countries of Southeast and Southwest Asia. In addition to the U.A.E., Seoul will be building a research reactor for Jordan, and potentially, full-scale reactors, as well. There are also discussions with Turkey.

Southeast Asia has been given a wake-up call by the South Korean move. The nuclear plant constructed in the Philippines by Westinghouse in the 1970s and ’80s was completed but never turned on, due to the Washington-orchestrated coup against President Ferdinand Marcos in 1986, as the U.S.A. itself was being taken over by anti-development, pro-British neoconservatives such as George Shultz and Paul Wolfowitz. The Philippine plant at Bataan is of the same design as several plants Westinghouse built in Korea, and the standardized model being used for Korea’s export program is based on the Westinghouse light-water reactors. A team from Korea visited the mothballed Philippine plant last year and confirmed that it could be refurbished and put to use, after these 25 long years in limbo—and Korea would be glad to build other plants in the Philippines as well.

The same is true for Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia, which should all have gone nuclear long ago, if not for the anti-nuclear psychosis, organized and paid for by the British and Dutch Royals. South Korea is both the model for industrial modernization through nuclearization, and now, also, the source of access to nuclear capacity, for developing countries. Several hundred youth from Southeast Asia have already been trained in nuclear science in Korea, and the program is now expanding.

The first Southeast Asian nation to go nuclear may well turn out to be Vietnam, the nation subjected to 30 years of colonial warfare by the French and the United States between 1945 and 1975. Having defended its sovereignty, at huge expense, Vietnam has now proudly declared that it will commence construction on four nuclear plants in 2014. Vietnam has signed nuclear agreements with Russia, Japan, and South Korea, although the final decision on who will build the plants has not yet been made.

Japan, for decades, the nuclear powerhouse of Asia, suffered the post-1980s “Western-style” anti-nuclear pull-back on nuclear energy, until recently. Japan now plans to add 12 new reactors at home by 2019, and increase nuclear production of energy from 25% to at least 40% by 2030. Through its ownership of U.S.-based Westinghouse, and partnership with General Electric, its substantial industrial manufacturing capacity is a major player in the expanding world market for new plants.

– The West’s Decline –

The impact of the collapse of nuclear power development in the West in the 1980s has demonstrated clearly that the human race can not survive without a return to nuclear. However, the destruction of the nuclear industry itself, and the demoralization and brainwashed state of governments and populations of Europe and the United States pose severe restraints on the emergency programs required to reverse the current rush into a new dark age.

James Muckerheide, the state nuclear engineer for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, in a June 24, 2005 EIR article (How to Build 6,000 Nuclear Plants by 2050) calculated that, if the world’s population is to achieve a decent living standard by 2050, the world must produce about 6,000 nuclear plants by that time, while committing adequate resources to nuclear fusion development, so that commercial fusion energy can be phased in by mid-century.

However, the world as a whole, at this time, has a productive capacity of only about 30 nuclear reactors per year. Only Japan, Russia, and China are even capable of producing the pressurized containment vessels for light water reactors. The United States, which estimated, in the 1970s, that it would have 1,000 nuclear plants on line by the year 2000, now has a total of only 104 commercial plants, and only 1 in the works. The U.S. shut down its only breeder reactor, and slashed the fusion program to a shadow of its original scope. Technologies, machine tools, scientists, and skilled labor of that caliber cannot be easily brought back together after this type of destruction.

In oligarchy-ridden Europe, the madness is worse. Sweden held a referendum in 1980, in which the only options were different rates for phasing out nuclear power altogether; and Germany’s Red-Green government, elected in 1998, established laws mandating the elimination of nuclear. Italy also closed the last of its nuclear reactors after the Chernobyl accident in 1986. All three are now considering reversing that idiocy, but at a snail’s pace.

France, with 59 nuclear plants, has the world’s highest rate of nuclear power usage, providing 76% of its electricity from nuclear generation. While French industries are still building nuclear plants around the world, there is only one under construction within the country, while the government subsidizes producers of solar power at 58 euro-cents per kw-hour produced, even though electricity from nuclear costs 3 euro-cents! Similarly insane subsidies for solar and windmills are in force across much of Western Europe, while its nuclear industries dwindle into nothing.

Perhaps the most insane of all, the European Union (EU) set as a condition for membership for the former Soviet bloc nations of eastern European, that they must shut down their old, Russian-built nuclear reactors! Bulgaria grudgingly closed two functioning reactors in 2006; Slovakia shut their last plant in 2008; and, just this month, Lithuania, which stood at second in the world after France in the percentage of electricity generated by nuclear power, at 72.89%, was forced to close down its only nuclear facility, in order to be allowed into the self-destructive alliance of European nations. Ironically, Lithuania has thus been left totally dependent on energy from Russia. These nations are all moving to construct new, “approved” nuclear plants, but the destructive impact will take decades to be reversed.

The task, then, is enormous, and vital, if civilization is to survive the current madness. Nuclear power is the keystone, and the East is showing the West the necessary direction.


Related articles:

  • Not All in South America Are For a British Orchestrated Dark Age, March 21, 2011 (LPAC)Officials from Argentina, Brazil, and Chile reaffirmed their intention to continue their nuclear power programs, as planned, despite mass flooding by the tsunami of lying British propaganda on the alleged “Japan nuclear crisis.” Argentina and Brazil are each working on building new nuclear plants, and have just formalized a program to jointly develop two research reactors in each country.
  • The Myth of Nuclear Waste, by Marjorie Mazel HechtThere’s no such thing as nuclear waste! This nasty term was invented just to stop the development of civilian nuclear power..
  • Nuplex City Building to Transform the Third World, by Marsha Freeman – Detailed plans to build nuclear-powered agro-industrial complexes date back to the Eisenhower Administration, but were never implemented. It’s high time to revive them.
  • On Fukushima Anniversary, Sane Argentines Tell Greenpeace to Shove It, March 11, 2012 – Greenpeace=Holland=Royal Dutch Shell…Greenpeace, are run by the Crown of the United Kingdom.So what do we do? burn diesel or coal? …Wind and solar don’t work for big cities. Should we return to the Stone Age? Should industries shut down? What about the unemployment this would cause? Nuclear plants are safe, there are hundreds in the world, and accidents, while serious, are few.”

Related videos:

  • Thorium‘s capacity as nuclear fuel was discovered during WW II, but ignored because it was unsuitable for making bombs. – This 16 minute video summarizes 197 minutes worth of Google Tech Talks on the subject of Thorium & LFTR.

  • Thorium 4th generation nuclear reactors – India’s example

THORIUM: L’avenir du nucléaire Indien


(1) Obama’s Malthusian, Anti-Nuclear Policy Exposed
(2) Stimulate The Economy: Build New Nuclear Plants!
(3) Sign the Petition to Stop Global Eco-Fascism
(4) SAFER, CHEAPER, MORE EFFICIENT: Inside the Fourth-Generation Reactors
(5) ECONOMIC SCIENCE, IN SHORT, by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. May 29, 2009

* Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation

*** More articles and videos from CanadaNewsLibre HERE !

Disclaimer: The views expressed in these articles and videos are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of CanadaNewsLibre. The contents of these articles and videos are of sole responsibility of the author(s). CanadaNewsLibre will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements. The CNL grants permission to cross-post original CanadaNewsLibre articles and videos on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. http://canadanewslibre may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

ↄ⃝  Copyleft CanadaNewsLibre 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s