Founder Elon Musk wrote that the company
“will not initiate patent lawsuits
against anyone who, in good faith,
wants to use [Tesla’s] technology.”
A Welcome Alternative to Current Trends,
Tesla Motors Opens Up Entire Patent Portfolio
By Adi Kamdar
June 12, 2014
The last few years have seen many examples of patents hindering, rather than helping innovation. Patent trolls run rampage while some big companies spend more money on patent wars than research and development. This is why it is so encouraging when companies commit to openness, ensuring their patents do not obstruct future innovation.
Today Tesla Motors announced it is opening up its patent portfolio. Founder Elon Musk wrote that the company “will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use [Tesla’s] technology.” While the precise details of this pledge aren’t clear yet, it is great to see a high-profile company embrace an open approach.
Tesla has reinvigorated the excitement around electric cars, yet they understand that patents are often antithetical to truly kicking off a sustainable movement (and a movement of sustainability). “If we clear a path to the creation of compelling electric vehicles,” Musk writes, “but then lay intellectual property landmines behind us to inhibit others, we are acting in a manner contrary to that goal.” Patents from first movers may secure a competitive advantage; however, if your company’s success and mission rely on widespread adoption, patents hinder more than they help.
Tesla is not the only company to realize this. We recently published a guide to alternative patent licensing discussing how various companies, most notably Twitter with their Innovator’s Patent Agreement, have taken tangible steps to ensure their patents are not used offensively. We would love to see Tesla commit their patents explicitly under an agreement like the Defensive Patent License, which sets a clear standard that patents are to be both shared and used for good.
The system built to promote the progress of science hasn’t been doing much of that recently. As recognized by Musk, in perhaps the most important point in Tesla’s statement: “Maybe [patents] were good long ago, but too often these days they serve merely to stifle progress, entrench the positions of giant corporations and enrich those in the legal profession, rather than the actual inventors.”
Musk’s observation is corroborated by a study released today by MIT’s Catherine Tucker on “The Effect of Patent Litigation and Patent Assertion Entities on Entrepreneurial Activity” [PDF]. In short, the paper finds that investment and entrepreneurship would have been higher if not for the hostile environment created by “frequent patent litigators,” such as patent trolls.
We are encouraged by Tesla’s announcement, and hope other companies—large and small—follow suit.
- PDF file ( tucker-report-5.16.14.pdf ): The Effect of Patent Litigation and Patent Assertion Entities on Entrepreneurial Activity, by Catherine E. Tucker, May 15, 2014 – New evidence suggests that more lawsuits candistract management from developing new and innovative products…
Follow us on Twitter
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of CanadaNewsLibre. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). CanadaNewsLibre will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements. The CNL grants permission to cross-post original CanadaNewsLibre articles and videos on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. canadanewslibre.com may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
ↄ⃝ Copyleft CanadaNewsLibre 2014